Peran Koperasi Dalam Meningkatkan Daya Saing UMKM Lokal Menggunakan Teknik Analisis TOPSIS dan DEMATEL (Studi Kasus Pada Koperasi Karyawan Dinas Koperasi Kota Depok)
Abstrak
This research integrates DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) methods within the BOCR (Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, Risks) framework to evaluate two cooperative development strategies: Capital Strengthening Strategy and Cooperative Digitalization Strategy. The study involves 8 criteria: 4 benefits/opportunities criteria (Easy Access to Capital, Competitive Raw Material Prices, Digital Technology Adoption, Inter-UMKM Collaboration) and 4 costs/risks criteria (Mandatory Member Dues, Coordination Meeting Time, Dependency on Cooperative, Loan Default Risk). DEMATEL Result : The Aggregate Matrix was developed from 2 expert respondents with consistency scores of 0.964 and 0.821 (100% expert agreement). Total Relation Matrix revealed that Dependency on Cooperative (D-R = +0.895) and Loan Default Risk (D-R = +0.884) are the strongest causal factors (cause group), while Coordination Meeting Time (D-R = -1.125) and Competitive Raw Material Prices (D-R = -0.782) are the most sensitive effect factors. Prominence analysis identified Dependency on Cooperative (7.492), Digital Technology Adoption (7.265), and Inter-UMKM Collaboration (7.142) as the most central criteria. Weights derived from Prominence ranged from 0.102 to 0.142, with Dependency on Cooperative having the highest weight (0.142). TOPSIS Result : The Weighted Normalized Matrix showed Capital Strengthening Strategy superiority in all high-weighted criteria: Easy Access to Capital (0.099 vs 0.089), Competitive Raw Material Prices (0.096 vs 0.073), and Digital Technology Adoption (0.099 vs 0.094), while having significantly lower costs and risks across all cost and risk criteria. Euclidean distance calculations revealed Capital Strengthening Strategy has zero distance to positive ideal solution (D+ = 0.000) and significant distance to negative ideal (D- = 0.044), while Cooperative Digitalization Strategy shows the opposite pattern (D+ = 0.044; D- = 0.000). The Closeness Coefficient (Ci*) for Capital Strengthening Strategy was 1.000 (Rank 1), compared to Cooperative Digitalization Strategy with 0.000 (Rank 2). Conclusion: The Capital Strengthening Strategy is perfectly superior (100% closeness to ideal) compared to the Cooperative Digitalization Strategy (0% closeness to ideal). The study recommends implementing the Capital Strengthening Strategy with strategic focus on managing dependency on cooperatives, loan default risks, and access to capital as causal factors. These findings provide a robust decision-support framework for cooperatives seeking to optimize their development strategies through evidence-based multi-criteria analysis.

