Focus and Scope
The purpose of this journal publication is to disseminate conceptual thinking or ideas and results of research that have been achieved in the field of economy..
Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif, specifically focuses on the main problems in the development of the science of public services as follows:
- Psikologi Klinis;
- Psikologi Inovatif;
- Psikologi Umum
Peer Review Process
Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif is published by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM).
The Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif article is entered through an electronic process (OJS), so each writer is obliged to register and enter the text through OJS (Registration).
Each script submitted will be subject to peer review (blind review) by 2 (two) reviewers. Peer reviews are conducted online by reviewers and the results will be communicated to the author via email.
The results of the review can be in the form of acceptance, revision, and rejection of the manuscript. The maximum review time is 1 (one) month after receipt of the manuscript. The review process will consider new things, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references. Reviewers will recommend accepting manuscript articles. The editor will decide whether the manuscript meets the requirements of the Information Technology Journal. Editor's decision is final.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif is a reviewed journal published by the Institute for Research and Community Service of the University of Persada Indonesia YAI. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the process of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, chief editor, Editorial Board, reviewer and publisher.
Ethics Guidelines for Journal Publication
The publication of an article in the Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif journal reviewed is an important building in the development of a coherent and recognized network of knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and institutions that support them. The reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on ethical standards that are expected for all parties involved in the act of publishing: writers, journal editors, best partners, publishers and the public.
The Institute for Research and Community Service of the University of Persada Indonesia YAI as the publisher of the journal Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif took the task of maintaining all stages of publishing very seriously and we were aware of our ethics and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprints or other commercial revenues do not affect or influence editorial decisions. In addition, the Institute for Research and Community Service of the University of Persada Indonesia and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and / or publishers if needed.
The Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif editor is responsible for deciding which articles to publish. Validation of the work and its importance for researchers and readers must always encourage that decision. Editors can be guided by policies from the journal editorial board and are limited by applicable legal provisions, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors can negotiate with other editors or best partners in making this decision.
The editor evaluates the manuscript at any time to the intellectual content of the author regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality, or political views of the authors.
The editor and every editorial staff must not disclose any information about the manuscript sent to anyone other than the author, reviewer, prospective reviewer, other appropriate editorial board, and publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Materials that are not published in a submitted text may not be used in the editor's own research without the written consent of the author.
Task of Reviewer
Contributions to Editorial Decisions
Bestari partners help editors in making editorial decisions and can help writers improve the quality of the manuscript through the editor.
Each selected reviewer who feels he does not meet the requirements / interests to review the manuscript or does not have enough time to study must immediately notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.
Each manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. Manuscripts must not be disseminated or discussed with others unless permitted by the editor.
Standard of Objectivity
Review must be done objectively. Personal criticism from the author is not appropriate to convey. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been quoted by the author. The statement that observations, derivations, or previously reported arguments must be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers must also state to the editor if there are substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscripts considered and any other articles published.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Information or ideas obtained in the review process must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers must reject texts where they have a conflict of interest due to competition, collaboration, or other relationships and connections with one of the authors, companies or institutions related to the manuscript.
The author of the original research report must present an accurate report of the work carried out and objective discussion of the significance of the research. The underlying data must be included accurately in the manuscript. A manuscript must contain sufficient details and references to allow others to imitate work. Reports of fraud or deliberately giving inaccurate information are unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Data Access and Retention
The author is asked to provide raw data related to the manuscript for editorial, and must be prepared to provide public access to the data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement of Data and Database), if possible, and must in any case save the data after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The authors must ensure that they have written the work completely original, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others, then this has been quoted correctly.
Double Publication, Redundant and Simultaneous
A writer may not publish a manuscript that describes the essence of the same research in more than one journal or main publication. Sending the same manuscript to more than one journal together is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.
Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author must quote publications that have been influential in determining the work reported.
List of Manuscript Authors
The author must be limited only to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research reported. All people who have made significant contributions must be registered as assistant writers. People or other parties who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or registered as contributors. The correspondence writer must ensure that all the authors are listed in the manuscript and there are no inappropriate authors, and that all authors have seen and agreed to the final version of the paper and have agreed to submit it for publication.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors must disclose in their texts any substantive or financial conflicts of interest that might be interpreted to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscripts. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.
Fundamental Errors in Works Published
When the author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in the work published, it is the duty of the author to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or refine the manuscript.
Editorial Board of Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif, University of Persada Indonesia . Jl. Diponegoro 74, Jakarta.
Peer Review Process
Journal of Community Service and Service is published by the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM).
Psikologi Kreatif Inovatif articles are entered through an electronic process (OJS), so that each writer must register and enter the manuscript through OJS (Registration).
Each incoming script will be peer reviewed (blind review) by 2 (two) reviewers. Peer reviews are carried out online by the reviewer and the results will be submitted to the author via email.
The results of the review can be in the form of acceptance, revision, and rejection of the text. The maximum review time is 1 (one) month after receipt of the manuscript. The review process will consider new things, objectivity, methods, scientific impacts, conclusions, and references. Reviewers will suggest receipt of manuscript articles. The editor will decide whether the manuscript meets the requirements of the Information Technology Journal. The editor's decision is final.